Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Treatment Zidovudin, Lamivudin, Nevirapin and Combination Tenofovir, Lamivudin, Efavirenz HIV/AIDS Patients in Bekasi Hospital

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ZIDOVUDIN, LAMIVUDIN, NEVIRAPIN (AZT (300)/3TC (150) / NVP (200)) AND TENOFOVIR, LAMIVUDIN, EFAVIRENZ (TDF (300) / 3TC (150) / 3TC (150) / NVP (200)) AND TENOFOVIR, LAMIVUDIN, EFAVIRENZ (TDF (300) / 3TC (150) / 3TC (150) / NVP (200)) / AIDS IN BEKASI HOSPITAL

Authors

  • Yusi Anggriani fakultas farmasi universitas pancasila
  • Fredrick Dermawan Purba Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjajaran ,
  • Reise Manninda Universitas Pancasila ,
  • Tarsinah Tarsinah Universitas Pancasila ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35814/jifi.v18i2.905

Keywords:

ARV/HAART, HIV/AIDS, Cost effectiveness analysis, CEA, ACER

Abstract

HIV/AIDS has become a global issue in many countries. The implementation of ARV / HAART
programs is always changing, due to clinical reasons, population factors, and aff ordability. Pharmacoeconomic studies can be one of the considerations in the policy process for procurement and selection of therapy regimens. The aims of this study were to determine the eff ectiveness of treatment based on CD4 increase and cost eff ectiveness analysis of HAART A and HAART B treatment regimens. This study used a cross sectional observation method. Retrospective data collection and non-experimental observation where conducted followes by a quantitative descriptive analysis according to the patient's perspective to obtain costeffectiveness data. Data were statistically analyzed to obtain the cost-eff ectiveness of treatment. The results showed that the cost-eff ectiveness analysis (CEA) of two regimens found that HAART A was more dominant than HAART B with a signifi cant diff erence p<0.05. While ACER regimen HAART A (16,227) was greater than the value ACER therapy B (28,330.7).

References

Downloads

Published

2020-10-28

Issue

Section

Articles